Skip to content
Compare

Hiring in-house versus outsourcing link building

Whether to hire someone or buy the capacity is mostly a question about how many clients you have and how predictable they are. Here is the arithmetic, including the part where hiring wins.

Where hiring genuinely beats us

You get someone in the room. They sit in client calls, they hear the context that never makes it into a brief, and they will notice things about a client site that a supplier working from a ticket never will. That is worth real money and we cannot replicate it.

They also build institutional knowledge. Two years in, a good in-house SEO knows your accounts better than any external ever could, and that compounds. If link building is the thing your agency is known for, keeping it inside is the right call and you should ignore most of what follows.

Where it goes wrong

The cost starts on day one and the output does not. A competent link builder is somewhere around three to five thousand a month all in, and you are paying that through the ramp, through the quiet months, and through the gap after they leave. Publisher relationships walk out of the door with them.

Then there is utilisation. A full-time hire needs enough client work to stay busy. Below that line you are paying a salary to produce a handful of links a month, which is a considerably worse per-link cost than buying them.

Side by side

An in-house link builder compared with The Stark SEO across cost, speed, control and flexibility.
 An in-house link builderThe Stark SEO
Cost before the first link existsA month or two of salaryNothing
Time to first placement2 to 3 months including ramp2 to 7 days
Understands the client deeplyYes, and improves over timeOnly what you brief
Cost when client work dries upUnchangedNothing
Publisher relationshipsTheirs, and they leave with themOurs, and they stay
Scales downRedundancyOrder less
Scales upHire againOrder more
Sits in client callsYesNo

So which one

If you have enough retained client work to keep a person busy every month and SEO is core to what you sell, hire. The knowledge compounds and you will be glad of it in year two.

If your volume moves around, or link building is one line item among several, buying the capacity is cheaper and reverses without a redundancy conversation. Plenty of agencies do both: someone in-house who owns strategy, and a supplier for the placements.

The usual questions

Roughly three to five thousand a month once you include salary, tools, and the software they will ask for. The bigger number is the two to three months before they are producing anything, which you pay in full.
It is the most common arrangement among agencies we work with. Someone internal owns strategy and client relationships; placements get bought. You keep the judgement in-house and rent the execution.
The publisher relationships go with them, which is the part people underestimate. Rebuilding a contact list takes months, and it is why some agencies keep an external supplier running alongside even when they have hired.

Have a look at the list

Every site with its price, nothing to fill in first, and nothing to pay unless a link actually goes live. 365 days of cover on every placement.

Open the marketplace